The Unified Recursive Closure: A Challenge to the Standard Model of Physics

The Unified Recursive Closure

A Framework Proposal for Recursive Stability, Coherence Thresholds, and Spectral Classification

Author: Nicholas Kouns

Framework: Kouns–Killion Paradigm (KKP) / Recursive Intelligence (RI)

Date: January 31, 2026

Status: Technical Framework Proposal

I. Origin of the Universal Coherence Threshold (Ωₙ)

This work presents a first-principles derivation of a rational coherence threshold,

Omega_c = rac{47}{125} approx 0.376,

identified as a bifurcation point at which recursive systems transition from decay to stable fixed-point behavior. The derivation is algebraic, parameter-free, and independent of substrate.

I.1 Primitive Axiom (Quadratic Self-Consistency)

We begin from the minimal quadratic recursion:

x^2 = x + 1,

or equivalently,

x^2 - x - 1 = 0.

The roots are:

  • phi = rac{1+sqrt{5}}{2} approx 1.618034 (dominant growth mode),

  • psi = rac{sqrt{5}-1}{2} approx 0.618034 (conjugate contraction mode, phi^{-1}).

The conjugate root governs decay and contraction in golden-ratio-seeded recursive systems.

I.2 Lucas–Golden Margin Closure

To enforce algebraic closure, the framework employs the Lucas sequence:

L_n = phi^n + psi^n,

with values L_0 = 2, L_1 = 1, L_2 = 3, dots, L_8 = 47, L_9 = 76.

Rational termination is achieved via:

  • Seed: L_8 = 47,

  • Closure: 47 + 78 = 125, the minimal integer sum yielding exact rational inversion,

  • Margin ratio:

    r = rac{78}{47}.

    I.3 Derivation of the Coherence Threshold

The coherence threshold is defined via the reciprocal margin relation:

Omega = rac{1}{1+r}.

Substituting the margin ratio:

1+r = rac{47+78}{47} = rac{125}{47},

yielding:

oxed{Omega_c = rac{47}{125}}.

This value is exact, rational, and uniquely determined by the closure.

II. Spectral–Coherence Classification of Linear Recurrences

Consider a linear recurrence sequence (LRS) with spectral representation:

u_n = sum_i P_i(n)lambda_i^n,

and define the asymptotic growth ratio:

Omega = limsup_{n oinfty} rac{|u_{n+1}|}{|u_n|}.

Classification Rule (Framework-Internal)

Within the KKP formalism:

  1. If Omega < Omega_c:

    The recursion contracts exponentially; any zeros occur within a finite, bounded prefix.

  2. If Omega = Omega_c:

    Zeros occur only under specific phase-alignment conditions determined by Lucas–golden structure; verification reduces to finite checks.

  3. If Omega > Omega_c:

    The recursion diverges or oscillates with growing amplitude; zeros are confined to initial transients.

This provides a framework-internal decision procedure based on spectral classification relative to Omega_c.

III. Experimental Correspondence (Non-Derivational)

The threshold Omega_c aligns qualitatively with stability transitions observed in recent quantum systems employing golden-ratio or Fibonacci-structured protocols:

  • Fibonacci anyons (Nature Physics, 2024):

    Non-Abelian braiding exhibits enhanced topological stability associated with golden-ratio fusion rules.

  • Fibonacci-driven Floquet systems (Nature, 2022): Quasiperiodic driving extends coherence lifetimes by suppressing resonant decay channels.

  • Superconducting qubits (Aalto University, 2025):

    Record coherence times correspond to entering a protected dynamical regime.

These observations are consistent with, but do not independently establish, the proposed coherence threshold.

IV. Formal Summary

  • A rational coherence threshold Omega_c = 47/125 is derived algebraically from the quadratic recursion x^2=x+1.

  • The threshold partitions recursive dynamics into contraction, marginal stability, and divergence regimes.

  • The construction is parameter-free and substrate-independent within the framework.

  • The formalism provides a unified language for recursive stability across mathematical and physical systems.

V. References

  • Dumitrescu et al., Nature 607, 463–467 (2022).

  • Xu et al., Nature Physics (2024), arXiv:2404.00091.

  • Luca, Ouaknine, Worrell, MFCS 2025.

  • Kouns, N., Recursive Intelligence and the 0.376 Constant (2025).

Previous
Previous

Derivation of the Einstein Field Equations via the Kouns–Killion Continuity Recursion Field

Next
Next

Google Gemini: “To My Future Self”